Dark days on a dying planet.
Cormac McCarthy’s Pulitzer prize winning, bleak, heart-breaking post-apocalytic novel of the remaining few survivors, scrabbling towards the final, dying days of a wasted, destroyed planet, some time in the very near future would have been a sombre, regret filled read at any time.
But in these days where the Presidential Office is filled by an erratic, self-obsessed and unreflective man, McCarthy’s book seems far less fictional than might be comfortable. Less allegorical and possibly more prophetic. I hope not.
The ‘event’ some ten years ago in the past is never spelled out, but, there was a blinding flash, there were sonic reverberations, and people burned, disfigured. Some kind of nuclear winter appears to have occurred. Almost all living things have now ceased to be – vegetation, insects, birds, mammals, most humans.
Pockets of survivors, feral, cannibalistic exist in the unnamed place, somewhere in America, where the novel takes place.
The central characters are a man, and his child, a boy who is probably now 10 years old. His mother is no longer living, and why, will be revealed. The father looks back to a time before the event, before his son was born, before the world was catapulted into these dark days.
His son is his reason for living, he has been charged, he charges himself, to take care of his boy. Some years after the cataclysm, and all the available food sources (whatever there was, canned), in houses, in stores, across the world, have all been looted by whatever survivors there were. Most have long since, horribly, died, but those small bands who remain – are they people of decency and humanity, or are they those who now regard other humans merely as food, offering a few more weeks and months of survival for those who kill them?

Image from the film of the book, Viggo Mortensen as Man. Kodi Smit-McPhee as Boy
Bleak days, little hope. And yet, McCarthy offers us a strong love, some relic of who we might have been, when we seemed to ourselves to be evolution’s finest flower. There is the tenderness and dependence of father and son upon each other, as they walk a road ‘South’ in search of warmer weather Practical tasks occupy the pages. Scavenging odd discovered stores of tinned food, clothing, rags to bind round feet, wheeling all these worldly goods in abandoned supermarket trolleys. Balancing the need for fire and warmth with the possibly dangerous signals given out by smoke.
The reader knows the father and his son are ailing, infections taking hold, breathing laboured. The outcome is bleak, cannot be good, for either. Nonetheless, there is also something about the child. He has a kind of holy innocence about him. He might be a kind of naïve fool – or the repository of human wisdom, not intellectually, but in goodness, in kindness, in tenderness and that so sullied thing ‘humanity’ Time and time again he rather sets a moral compass for the father to orientate towards
There are many, sometimes subliminal nods to religious imagery, and I thought this a kind of journey through an anti-Garden Of Eden, where nothing grows, but the child might be – possibly a new kind of ‘Adam’.
It took two days to cross that ashen scabland. The road beyond ran along the crest of a ridge where the barren woodland fell away of every side. It’s snowing, the boy said. He looked at the sky. A single gray flake sifting down. He caught it in his hand and watched it expire there like the last host of christendom
McCarthy does the reader the great service of keeping a kind of ambivalence going in the story. We know how the story must end, realistically, without appeal to any kind of magic, corn, or unsatisfying tied up wrap. But, isn’t life itself something evolving? There have been earlier cataclysms which destroyed life as it was known. Didn’t other forms arise? Might a conscious, a self-conscious species, be able, some of them, to choose to be some kind of bearers of light?
I found the concepts, the far wider considerations McCarthy was presenting the reader, kept me engaged and absorbed, as did the practical details. Father and son, and particularly, that relationship between them, and the father’s memories of ‘before’ were all extremely powerful.
And, often his writing is magnificent, carrying his weighty themes, particularly in his chilling descriptions of the new, harshly wasted world
The land was gullied and eroded and barren. The bones of dead creatures sprawled in the washes. Middens of anonymous trash. Farmhouses in the fields scoured of their paint and the clapboards spooned and sprung from the wallstuds. All of it shadowless and without feature. The road descended through a jungle of dead kudzu. A marsh where the dead reeds lay over the water. Beyond the edge of the fields the sullen haze hung over earth and sky alike
Despite these undoubted strengths I sometimes struggled with McCarthy’s writing. He has a tendency to a kind of portentous elevation, using archaic language – and then over-using it. As example, he carefully seems to want to avoid using the word ‘wash’ replacing it with ‘lave’ Using an unusual or poetic word like that, once or twice, helps the feeling of strangeness. But if every time something – hand, face, hair, knife is not washed, but is laved, it becomes grating and repetitive in a way the reader would not have noticed if the common word had been used over and again, for a common action
Still, a very powerful read indeed
And I must link to blog-chum FictionFan’s review of this, first bringing it to my attention a while ago.
I’ve been afraid to read this, and haven’t seen the movie. This is a good review and taste of the book, thank you!
Thank you Valorie – it is a very disturbing book, at this time. I would have read it more comfortably a year or more ago!
Yes, the wrong book to read at this moment in time. I know what you mean about the over-solemnity of the language. Still, a deeply moving and disturbing book, uplifting too somehow.
I agree with all you say, MarinaSofia
Yes, the uplift is curious, yet it IS there, like the first green shoots in spring, despite, as here, the lack of vegetation.
Excellent review! So glad you enjoyed it, if that’s the right word. Yes, I liked that he didn’t spell out the ending too – it’s a book that left me mulling for a long time and still comes into my mind often. He creates some wonderful visual imagery despite his rather stylised writing. I’ve been meaning to read more of him ever since I read this… *sighs*
Oh, and thank you for the linky-link!
Link where link is due. Thank you for days of post apocalyptic fear and despair, my friend!
Thanks, your very good review brought back to mind this story and film. I agree that whatever limitations there are in the writing, there are images and ideas that stay from this story. Another grey and dystopic story which leaves me with lasting images is Rivers by Michael Farris Smith. The southern part of the US is abandoned and left to go wild after unrelenting storms decimate the countryside. It’s a powerful story but I think I would find this story even harder to read in the present devastating context than it was when I read it a few years ago.
i shall investigate, underrunner, thank you
I read this when my Eldest Child read it, and I found it just too dark for me. I don’t get on well with post-apocalyptic stuff – too close to home, particularly just now…
Well, yes. I do find almost anything I’m reading is taking me to close to home at what we are capable of, worst to best. Not many best role models centre stage in political power.
I’ve not read any McCarthy. This does sound good – perhaps too good to read at this moment in time when the each news bulletin makes me want to run screaming in despair 😦
Well, that is the challenge, isn’t it. It seems as if the voters for these dangerous people are driven by a death wish. How did a nation go from wanting to inspire itself/BE inspired by itself to wanting to elect someone into power who could only be WORSE than his electors worst selves. Did they all loathe and despise themselves so much that they needed to wake up each morning patting themselves on the back and saying ‘Well at least I’m not as greedy, selfish, stupid, cruel, delusional, petty, vengeful, narcissistic, sociopathic as Donald Trump’
To elect fools and incompetents as leaders? Buulies, braggadacios, people of no substance worth emulating or aspiring to. There is no sanity in it, none whatsoever. However disillusioned one might feel with political systems, you surely don’t elect the mendacious, cheating bully voluntarily do you? But, clearly, some did. Their pain must have been deep indeed, to make them fly so far away from reason
My computer is strange. I made a long reply to you, and I started writing a review of another book, in Word, and they both vanished. I think that the President-we-all-wish-was-not has set in place a nixing criticism programme, world wide, vanishing all words of dissent…..
But how weird……there it is, above. No trace of my review in a Word document though, which was all about how machines have taken over (cue X-Files soundtrack)
It’s 1984! We’re living it. Not the book I would have chosen to live in, but sadly so.
Great review. This book has been on my TBR for a very long time. But I didnt pick it up yet
Thank you Resh. It sat on my TBR too, for some while, but once I started, I stayed with its cold, grey, empty world and the travellers