A very superior thriller indeed.
Michael Robotham’s Texan set thriller clearly owes a lot to Stephen King’s Shawshank Redemption as a beginning, an idea, and a kind of relationship: Two convicts, ones the reader is absolutely meant to root for, in essence good and noble men, one black, one white. The white man, Audie Palmer, in theory is obviously in no way hardened, or dangerous, and is likely to get beaten and savaged. But somehow, he survives the ten years of his sentence, despite various inmates making sporadic beelines to try and kill him. He and the black man, Moss Webster, strike up a deep and quiet friendship during Palmer’s sentence.
Audie Palmer had confessed to an armed payroll robbery, in the course of which, 4 people died. The 7 million dollars taken in the robbery have never been found, and much of the violence meted out to Palmer in prison was from various inmates and guards and gangs anxious to beat the money’s hiding place out of him.
The novel opens the night before the end of Palmer’s sentence : he is to be released the next day. Instead of which, he escapes from prison, and goes on the run.
Something, in fact, pretty well everything, is not what it seems…….and the reader very quickly will come to the conclusion that despite confessing to the crime, Palmer is clearly innocent. So that becomes another question. And, whilst rapidly everyone starts frantically searching for Palmer, including not just local law enforcement officers, but the FBI, one of the FBI agents is also battling with a growing feeling that Palmer may indeed be innocent (so, shades of The Fugitive too)
Robotham builds a tightly twisting spider’s web of a story, with some useful red herrings thrown into the mix. Central to the plot is that ten year friendship between Moss and Audie, both their back stories, the strong women in their lives, Audie’s own background, figures with Mob connections, corrupt politicians and business leaders. And good police and bad police. And much more.
It’s a brutal story (if not always completely believable in terms of the amount of beatings, maimings, shootings and the like that the fictional human body survives) but what lifts it above just another thriller is the strong characterisations (although I do have a cavil, here too) and the extremely well drawn relationships. Audie and Moss, and their respective significant others are all extremely attractive characters, whom the reader will care about, and have empathy with, and this is also a big plus for this book. You will be involved, without a doubt.
There are also a lot of very ignoble, unattractive villains, with little redeemable about them, and, because they are out to get the people we care about, it is a classic battle between good and evil and the reader will root for the heroes and want the villains to get their justs, too
And then there is that FBI agent who all the way through smells rats……and rather knows the rat is not at all Palmer. Special Agent Desiree Furness is a brilliant operative. And she is shrimp sized, and despite being as tough, feisty, brave and fit as any ripped muscle hunk in the Feds, is under a huge disadvantage as her size makes everyone think she is a wee teen. And she gets permanently teased and humiliated. However, she is made of very strong stuff indeed, gives as good as she gets, and provides much of the necessary humour in the book, as she can outclass most of those who patronise her in wit, sass and intelligence. Moss too has a nice line in not only repartee, but his own internal thoughts about matters, as related by Robotham (the book is third person narrative) :
Moss is not a lover of the countryside. He’s city born and bred, preferring to know the proximity of his nearest takeout than seeing newborn lambs gambolling in a meadow or a field of wheat shivering in the breeze. The countryside has too many things that buzz, bite, slither or growl, and it also happens to be full of murderous hicks who think lynching black men should still be a recognised sport, especially in parts of the South
At the start of this interview with Robotham, the interviewer starts by saying ‘you are a lovely man – why crime writing’ – and, as I’m sure you will agree, Robotham does indeed come across as someone comfortable in his heart, comfortable in his skin
If I couldn’t quite go fully surrendered 5 star on this it was for two reasons. Firstly, in order to make all those many cliffhanging tension moments that are scattered in the various chases (all very filmic), there were rather too many coincidences for my liking, and in fact I did think, ‘this is filmic in structure – I could ‘see’ the cutaways, and indeed hear the kind of soundtrack playing in my head – it for sure will get made for the screen. I would lay money on that, even if not quite a missing 7 million dollars!
And the second reason is that though absolutely excellently done our heroes and our villains are on the one hand a little too noble and on the other, a little too unremittingly sulphurous in their villainy. I do prefer the greater discomfort of nuance.
And………I admit to crying at the end of the book…………but it was a little crossly……..there is a ‘wrap’ which in terms of the sentiments expressed (which I wouldn’t necessarily argue with) came across as veering into sentiment and corn. So, I kind of felt a little manipulated. Now I have no objection to crying, but prefer that emotional response to not feel ‘worked on’ – this was a bit cue Hollywood, swelling sobbing strings.
But then, as Robotham says, part of his intention with this one was to write a love story
I received this as a review copy from the publisher, Little, Brown Book Group UK
I loved this one too – in fact, I spent most of last year raving about various of Robotham’s books. He was a ‘find’ for me. But I must say I’m surprised you enjoyed it – I wouldn’t have thought it was your kind of thing at all. I’d compare it – and probably did – to Harlan Coben…
I know I wasn’t initially drawn to this, and didn’t take it the first time it surfaced on NetGalley. I suspect your review comparing it to Harlan Coben, whom as you know I am a bit stop go with, made me pass on by. It surfaced again from NetGalley, I suspect on a re-release or a paperback release or something. I’m not quite sure what made me want to try it, possibly it was the Shawshank connection, as that was really strongly about a relationship, so I thought there would probably be quite a lot of heart in the book. As there is. And, of course, I have been so deeply mired in crime with my journey with Tana French that I’m supping up grit, grime and general bad behaviour with gun and knife (as long as there is some kindness in the pages as well) So as you can see, there WAS lots to enjoy, but also stuff I was raising my eyebrows on, looking hard boiled and disbelieving . If you can, when you can only raise your brows together. Perhaps I should buy a joke eyebrow which i can slap on my left eyebrow if I want to make a ‘Hmm, I don’t buy THAT’ face whilst reading.
It got to 4 star though, comfortably!
This one’s already in my TBR list and, in the right mood, I’m sure I too will enjoy this story grounded in relationships with the grit and complications of life not lived straightforwardly. I read Robotham’s Watching You which was thrilling in all senses. Thanks for your review, LF.
Well, if both you AND FF are pushing further Robothams I shall have to put Watching You on the TBR Possible pile!
Though at the moment I’m salivating and champing at the bit, waiting for two ‘real’ books to arrive with the postman, both of which I expect to be corkers, and which will need a clear mind, heart and presence to fully savour : new ARCS from a couple of writers who I bow down before, both previous recipients of glowing purple prose from me on this site : Janice Galloway and Rebecca Mascull.
Janice Galloway is slowly moving up my TBR pile, Rebecca Mascull is new to me; I look forward to hearing more.
Rebecca Mascull has only written one novel, The Visitors, which was one of my stunning and unexpected ‘finds’ last year. And I have been impatiently waiting for her second novel since then. She has a LOT to live up to, with the excellence of that first one! I think she has been seriously under-rated. If her second novel manages to be as wonderful as her first, I think she is going to be one of those writers who is so unostentatiously wonderful that its going to take some time, in a world where excess and shouting seems to get noticed, for her to quietly be buzzed about, till the buzz gets loud enough to be heard by the Metropolitan movers and shakers. She doesn’t live in London, and I think going to the places where the shiny suits and the glammy designer dressers can Mwa Mwa each other, does a lot to pump up celebrity and fame.
Sounds great! The Shawshank Redemption is one of my favourite films and this does sound very similar. I’m not good with explicit violence though, so maybe I’ll have to wait for the film version where at least I can fast-forward/hide behind by hands!
Yes : Shawshank – and I absolutely had Morgan Freeman in my mind’s eye with Moss, Tim Robbins also, for Audie (of course neither would be able to play them in any film made of this as they are too old) TBH I’m not sure I’d WANT to see the film because Freeman and Robbins (as they were THEN) are my ideal casting!
This is a new author’s name to me. I don’t usually read this kind of book but I might well be tempted
I’m not really a genre reader, but do happily find books which happen to be ‘in genre’ if you see what I mean.